Recently, a growing number of voices and opinions from various types of experts have been raised to assert that the UN is, in fact, largely obsolete and in need of a major overhaul. Recent online polls have shown that three times as many people consider the UN to be an ineffective organisation as those who see it as a kind of “last bastion of humanity”.
The essence of the claims is that the universal organisation, which was set up to resolve the political and economic issues of states, as well as to help settle territorial disputes, has recently not only failed to carry out the tasks assigned to it, but has also come under attack from a number of senior political officials.
The latest scandal erupted when Israel’s permanent representative to the UN called on the organisation’s secretary-general, António Guterres, to resign after his comments on the conflict in the Gaza Strip. These comments seemed extremely harsh. It should be noted that in the past, politicians and high-ranking officials of countries had not allowed themselves to make such direct accusations against the organisation and its executive body.
“A UN Secretary General who shows incomprehension in the face of a campaign of massacres of children, women and the elderly is not fit to lead the UN. I call on him to resign immediately”, wrote Gilad Erdan in response to UN Secretary-General António Guterres, who said that “Hamas attacks do not come from nothing, because the Palestinian people have been subjected to a suffocating occupation for 56 years”.
It should be remembered that another scandal recently broke concerning the non-issuance of visas to members of the Russian delegation to meetings of the working groups of UN committees. In September 2023, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov stated that not all Russian representatives had received US visas for the UN General Assembly. They included the Deputy Chairman of the State Duma and some heads of departments in the Russian Foreign Ministry.
It should be pointed out that this issue of visa refusals has been systematically brought up by the United States and its allies for at least a year and a half. Since 2022, the number of such incidents has increased. Western countries have also repeatedly refused to issue visas or entry permits to Russian officials and delegations.
In my opinion, this is being done systematically and deliberately, in order to provoke a reaction from the Russian leadership and initiate the procedure for Russia’s withdrawal from the UN (which would be ideal for the West), or the gradual dissolution of the organisation due to the ‘loss of confidence’ of the players in international politics, if one can put it that way.
The actions of Israeli leaders in the case of the impeachment of the UN Secretary-General have also served to add fuel to the fire of mutual attacks.
It is worth digressing here and recalling that Israel is recognised as a state, although it is recognised by the majority, but not all, of the members of the United Nations, namely 165 of the 193 UN member states.
At least 28 countries have never recognised Israel or have withdrawn their recognition of Israel as a state in its own right. These are mainly Arab countries in Africa and the Middle East, such as Qatar, Pakistan, Oman, Kuwait, Lebanon, Malaysia, Iran (which broke off relations in 1979), Iraq, Indonesia, Cuba (which broke off relations in 1973), Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Saudi Arabia, Syria, a number of African countries and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK).
It is clear that Israel is not happy with this situation, and has not been for a long time. Now it has a pretext and an opportunity not only to present its old demands for world recognition, but also, if it is refused, to demand the dissolution of the UN and the creation of a new supranational institution of which Israel would be a full member, perhaps with a right of veto, like the permanent members of the UN Security Council.
Other countries in the Western collective also have their own demands of the organisation, because on the one hand, the organisation is going through a certain crisis, having virtually no leverage left over the countries at war, and on the other hand, the West no longer needs an organisation such as the UN. This is why this “project” is trying to disappear, because it is ineffective.
What’s more, this process has its obvious stakeholders. An organisation that does not have the right to exert “legitimate pressure” simply becomes useless. The world order is changing, the rules of the game are changing. The Western collective, which realises this, is trying to further undermine the existing framework of mutual coexistence in the hope of winning this confrontation.
Some analysts compare the current crisis of the organisation to the crisis in which the world order and the Society of Nations found themselves at the start of the Second World War. Officially aimed at preventing hostilities, ensuring collective security and settling disputes between countries through diplomatic negotiations, the Society of Nations failed to achieve the statutory objectives for which it had been created in 1919. In fact, the organisation ceased to exist in 1942 and, in 1946, transferred all its powers to the newly created UN.
Apparently, the United States has chosen a similar scenario today. If the UN cannot prevent wars and conflicts and, above all, if it does not allow the sole will of the United States and its partners to be carried out through it, then let’s think about creating a new organisation to replace the United Nations. The interest is clear and calculated.
But for Russia, at least for the time being, this option does not suit it at all. As a permanent member of the UN Security Council (and what’s more, of the five permanent members, at least one is our obvious ally – China), it has the unquestionable right to express its position on international issues and to veto UN Security Council resolutions that are not in its interests.
On the other hand, I see no reason to believe that the world community today would be capable of creating a better international organisation based not only on the law, but also on the principles of justice and humanity.
Specialist in international relations, doctoral student in political science Veronika Kazakova – especially for Donbass Insider
THE HAGUE, 31 January 2024. The International Court of Justice today handed down its Judgment in the case concerning Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine v. Russian Federation).
In the operative clause of today’s Judgment, which is final, without appeal and binding on the Parties, the Court:
“(1) By thirteen votes to two,
Finds that the Russian Federation, by failing to take measures to investigate facts contained in information received from Ukraine regarding persons who have allegedly committed an offence set forth in Article 2 of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism, has violated its obligation under Article 9, paragraph 1, of the said Convention;
(2) By ten votes to five,
Rejects all other submissions made by Ukraine with respect to the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism;
(3) By thirteen votes to two,
Finds that the Russian Federation, by the way in which it has implemented its educational system in Crimea after 2014 with regard to school education in the Ukrainian language, has violated its obligations under Articles 2, paragraph 1 (a), and 5 (e) (v) of the International Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination;
(4) By ten votes to five,
Rejects all other submissions made by Ukraine with respect to the International Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination;
(5) By eleven votes to four,
Finds that the Russian Federation, by maintaining limitations on the Mejlis, has violated its obligation under paragraph 106 (1) (a) of the Order of 19 April 2017 indicating provisional measures;
(6) By ten votes to five,
Finds that the Russian Federation has violated its obligation under paragraph 106 (2) of the Order of 19 April 2017 indicating provisional measures to refrain from any action which might aggravate or extend the dispute between the Parties, or make it more difficult to resolve;
(7) By eleven votes to four, Rejects all other submissions made by Ukraine with respect to the Order of the Court of 19 April 2017 indicating provisional measures.
Finds that the Russian Federation, by the way in which it has implemented its educational system in Crimea after 2014 with regard to school education in the Ukrainian language, has violated its obligations under Articles 2, paragraph 1 (a), and 5 (e) (v) of the International Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination;
This makes it a Kangaroo court, because it did not find Ukraine guilty of violating its obligations under Articles 2, paragraph 1 (a), and 5 (e) (v) of the International Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination; for suppression of the Russian language in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine.
The court has to be CRAZY , to say that Russia violated the rights of a 90% Russian speaking area, by having public education in the Russian language, and that Ukraine was not in any violation by having all public schooling in Ukrainian language in a 90% Russian speaking area. Where the majority of Russian speakers are NOT bi-lingual and do not speak Ukrainian , and where there has NEVER BEEN a large Ukrainian speaking population EVE
The U.N. Ends 2022 By Calling On The International Court ...
5 jan. 2023 — While the court cannot enforce any findings, it represents only the latest attempt by the United Nations to demonize Israel on the world stage.
It is in the west of the country, in the province South Holland. It is the capital of the province. About 1 million people live in the urban area of The Hague, ...
The International court Of Justice said it fights against racism! The ICJ does not stop white replacement in Australia, United States, Britain, and Ireland. Non white races are taking over in whiter native lands in Europe.
The United Nations UNESCO wants to break down all boundaries in all countries. It is behind the multiracial, multicultural agenda in all nations, promoting third world immigration, into White Countries (Britain, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Ireland Ukraine, and Russia). The invasion into all first world nations and has continued to build upon. The original idea and concepts promoted by Coudenhove-Kalergi in the early 20th century.
The UNESCO (The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization), Brown Man pictured on the right is the ultimate goal of their long-term agenda. The screenshot of this image here was taken from a book called The Ultimate World Order by Robert H Williams (1957) and is an in-depth analysis of a book called "The Jewish Utopia" by Paul Higgins (1932). Under the image it reads:
The "UNESCO Brown Man", as we may call him or it, which I photographed from page 70 of the book UNITED NATIONS: Blueprint for Peace. The author of the book says the picture is an official UN photograph. The cutline under the picture says it "represents all of us, everyone on earth". Obviously, this raceless, characterless "man", standing on the world, is the UNESCO ideal toward which all of us must work, the blending of all the races of mankind into one composite, raceless, nationless, homeless, characterless, faceless, brown slob - utterly lost from all heritage and completely subject to the will of the Zionist "master race" - which, while producing the propaganda to cause us to blend, quickens the tribal pride of the Jews to keep them from blending. The statue resembles the "art" of and evidently was done by, the Jewish revolutionary Bernard Rosenthal who also did the famous or infamous trio, the Faceless Family. "Mr and Mrs. Faceless and Little Faceless", showing parents and a child just like the above, representing the future family.
White traitor Jew Promote Race-Mixing To Genocide All Races Including Whites and many Jews
“We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is RACIAL TENSION. By propounding into the consciousness of the DARK races, that for centuries they have been oppressed by Whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the Whites, we will endeavor to instill in the Whites, a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negros. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the PROFESSIONS, and in the world of SPORTS and ENTERTAINMENT. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to INTER-MARRY with the Whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.” AUTHOR – Israel Cohen(Zionist — Communist — Internationalist) “A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century” >Published in 1912 . On June 17, 1957, the above passage was read into the United States Congressional Record by Rep. Thomas G. Abernathy
Veronika Kazakova, political scientist: Are the UN’s days over?
27/10/2023
Recently, a growing number of voices and opinions from various types of experts have been raised to assert that the UN is, in fact, largely obsolete and in need of a major overhaul. Recent online polls have shown that three times as many people consider the UN to be an ineffective organisation as those who see it as a kind of “last bastion of humanity”.
The essence of the claims is that the universal organisation, which was set up to resolve the political and economic issues of states, as well as to help settle territorial disputes, has recently not only failed to carry out the tasks assigned to it, but has also come under attack from a number of senior political officials.
The latest scandal erupted when Israel’s permanent representative to the UN called on the organisation’s secretary-general, António Guterres, to resign after his comments on the conflict in the Gaza Strip. These comments seemed extremely harsh. It should be noted that in the past, politicians and high-ranking officials of countries had not allowed themselves to make such direct accusations against the organisation and its executive body.
“A UN Secretary General who shows incomprehension in the face of a campaign of massacres of children, women and the elderly is not fit to lead the UN. I call on him to resign immediately”, wrote Gilad Erdan in response to UN Secretary-General António Guterres, who said that “Hamas attacks do not come from nothing, because the Palestinian people have been subjected to a suffocating occupation for 56 years”.
It should be remembered that another scandal recently broke concerning the non-issuance of visas to members of the Russian delegation to meetings of the working groups of UN committees. In September 2023, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov stated that not all Russian representatives had received US visas for the UN General Assembly. They included the Deputy Chairman of the State Duma and some heads of departments in the Russian Foreign Ministry.
It should be pointed out that this issue of visa refusals has been systematically brought up by the United States and its allies for at least a year and a half. Since 2022, the number of such incidents has increased. Western countries have also repeatedly refused to issue visas or entry permits to Russian officials and delegations.
In my opinion, this is being done systematically and deliberately, in order to provoke a reaction from the Russian leadership and initiate the procedure for Russia’s withdrawal from the UN (which would be ideal for the West), or the gradual dissolution of the organisation due to the ‘loss of confidence’ of the players in international politics, if one can put it that way.
The actions of Israeli leaders in the case of the impeachment of the UN Secretary-General have also served to add fuel to the fire of mutual attacks.
It is worth digressing here and recalling that Israel is recognised as a state, although it is recognised by the majority, but not all, of the members of the United Nations, namely 165 of the 193 UN member states.
At least 28 countries have never recognised Israel or have withdrawn their recognition of Israel as a state in its own right. These are mainly Arab countries in Africa and the Middle East, such as Qatar, Pakistan, Oman, Kuwait, Lebanon, Malaysia, Iran (which broke off relations in 1979), Iraq, Indonesia, Cuba (which broke off relations in 1973), Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Saudi Arabia, Syria, a number of African countries and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK).
It is clear that Israel is not happy with this situation, and has not been for a long time. Now it has a pretext and an opportunity not only to present its old demands for world recognition, but also, if it is refused, to demand the dissolution of the UN and the creation of a new supranational institution of which Israel would be a full member, perhaps with a right of veto, like the permanent members of the UN Security Council.
Other countries in the Western collective also have their own demands of the organisation, because on the one hand, the organisation is going through a certain crisis, having virtually no leverage left over the countries at war, and on the other hand, the West no longer needs an organisation such as the UN. This is why this “project” is trying to disappear, because it is ineffective.
What’s more, this process has its obvious stakeholders. An organisation that does not have the right to exert “legitimate pressure” simply becomes useless. The world order is changing, the rules of the game are changing. The Western collective, which realises this, is trying to further undermine the existing framework of mutual coexistence in the hope of winning this confrontation.
Some analysts compare the current crisis of the organisation to the crisis in which the world order and the Society of Nations found themselves at the start of the Second World War. Officially aimed at preventing hostilities, ensuring collective security and settling disputes between countries through diplomatic negotiations, the Society of Nations failed to achieve the statutory objectives for which it had been created in 1919. In fact, the organisation ceased to exist in 1942 and, in 1946, transferred all its powers to the newly created UN.
Apparently, the United States has chosen a similar scenario today. If the UN cannot prevent wars and conflicts and, above all, if it does not allow the sole will of the United States and its partners to be carried out through it, then let’s think about creating a new organisation to replace the United Nations. The interest is clear and calculated.
But for Russia, at least for the time being, this option does not suit it at all. As a permanent member of the UN Security Council (and what’s more, of the five permanent members, at least one is our obvious ally – China), it has the unquestionable right to express its position on international issues and to veto UN Security Council resolutions that are not in its interests.
On the other hand, I see no reason to believe that the world community today would be capable of creating a better international organisation based not only on the law, but also on the principles of justice and humanity.
Specialist in international relations, doctoral student in political science Veronika Kazakova – especially for Donbass Insider
What a two-faced fraud this guy is ........ he says UN has a right to argue against the use of this munition .... in actuality, UN has the right to enforce the proscription against any terrorist state that employs outlawed weaponry.
This fraud had a duty under UN Charter to identify Joseph R. Biden as a terrorist and America as a terrorist state .. he didn't. UN is a joke .. just like World Court is a joke. Welcome back to the Cold War that Reagan and Gorbachev ended .. and Daddy Bush and his psycho Neocons reignited.
Burkina Faso's government has expelled a top UN official, Barbara Manzi, for 'discrediting the country.' Local reporter Ouezen Louis-Oulon brings us the details.
The United Nations in New York City, in the United States.
The majority of the world's population does not realize the United Nations, with the help of traitorous politicians working to take our right away.
We, the people, have not been asked if we want to be run by a world United Nations dictatorship, because of our western media and political parties, do not inform us in many cases what the United Nations is trying to change or has changed and how much influence they have in the running of our countries.
The United Nations is not the first attempt by the globalists to set up a world governing body. The idea of the UN originally stemmed from the US State Department back in 1939 and its ideas were founded from previous attempts at world government including the League of Nations which was founded not even 20 years prior. It also based its foundations on The Concert of Europe which was an alliance of European states that maintained a balance of power within the region between the end of the Napoleonic Wars to the beginning of World War I. Both the League of Nations and The Concert of Europe failed due to large shifts within the political landscapes of the time and after World War II the world was ripe for another attempt at creating a New World Order.
The original UN Charter was ratified by 26 signatories and by the end of 1945 was signed by 51 member states. Behind the governments agreeing to the concepts and charter of this governing body are some of the world's leading elite including the Rothschild's, Rockefeller's, Council on Foreign Relations, World Bankers, Fabian Society, Trilateral Commission, and the Zionists. The Rockefeller family donated the land that the UN head office was built on in New York City.
There is much historical evidence of the involvement of the of globalist elite, including this arrogant quote by James P. Warburg a member of an influential banking Jewish family proclaimed before the U.S. Senate on 17th February 1950:
"We shall have world government whether or not we like it. The only question is whether world government will be achieved by conquest or consent".
The main stream media which is owned in large by members promoting the New World Order Globalist doesn't discuss or allow the public to know the real reasons behind the United Nations.
The United Nations Universal Aims:
Reduce world population.
Remove national sovereignty.
Disarm the public - destroy private gun ownership.
One central army under the United Nations control.
Abolish national constitutions (including the American constitution).
Remove the right to free speech.
Reduce Birth Rate - introduce tax on those who have more than two children.
Abolish private property including farming and businesses.
Introduce universal migration ensuring full multicultural goals are met.
The development of International Law is one of the primary goals of the United Nations. The Charter of the United Nations, in its Preamble, sets the objective "to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained".
Who Wrote the United Nations Charter?
One of the most concerning aspects about the original charter of the United Nations was that one of its primary writers was a representative of the State Department - Alger Hiss. This is most worrying as Alger Hiss was incarcerated later on for being a Communist Spy for the USSR. While Hiss maintained his innocence up until the day he died, there is quite significant evidence that has now been declassified proving his guilt.
His questionable background was known at the time and the ethics of using a communist spy in such important literature was brought up in a speech made to the House of Representatives on Wednesday, April 28, 1954, the Hon. Usher L Burdick of North Dakota questioned:
"Who were the principal movers at San Francisco for this United Nations Charter? Who wrote the Charter? and who had the most to do in shaping its provisions? The answer is that the Russian Communists and Alger Hiss, a representative of State Department, were the prime movers and schemers in arranging its provisions. That is the same Alger Hiss who was convicted of perjury when he denied sending secret material to the Soviet Union representatives. Its very beginning gave the document a bad odor".
The United Nations Founders
May - July 1945
U.S Delegation
Secret Communists - 16
Council on Foreign Relations Members - 43
Anti-Semitic Zionist Influence of the United Nations and World Government
There has been an ongoing globalist Zionist/communist agenda of World Government, well before the creation of Israel. The first president of Israel was not shy to discuss this idea of a world order under Jewish control and it came often frequently in various interviews that span decades.
"Our policy must be the unity of the human race. The world is divided into two blocs. We consider that the United Nations ideal is a Jewish ideal."
He discussed it again in the 60s during the Cold War:
"All armies will be abolished, and there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the scene of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prohesied by Isaiah."
Zionist leader Nahum Sokolow bragged that the League of Nations the precursor of the United Nations was also a Jewish invention:
"The League of Nations is a Jewish idea, and Jerusalem some day will become the capital of the world's peace. We Jews throughout the world will make the League's struggle our own and will not rest until there is ultimate victory."
- Dr. Sokolow, Zionist Conference (1922) Carlsbad, California
There is no denying that the Zionists have openly embraced and admitted their involvement in a one world government in the last century.
United Nations Structure
United Nations Security Council
The Security Council is run by five permanent members - Russia, China, United States, France and United Kingdom. The majority of these "superpowers" are very heavily influenced by globalist who have an iron grip on these nations due to their vast financial wealth which has bought them control of the political, banking and media agendas.
Each of these five permanent members is given veto rights where unless all five countries agree on an item, it isn't approved. Alongside the five permanent members, another five countries are elected for two year seats on the Security Council though these additional five nations do not receive veto rights.
May resolve non-compulsory recommendations to states or suggestions to the Security Council (UNSC);
Decides on the admission of new members, following proposal by the UNSC;
Adopts the budget;
Elects the non-permanent members of the UNSC; all members of ECOSOC; the UN Secretary General (following his/her proposal by the UNSC); and the fifteen judges of the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Each country has one vote.
Supports the other UN bodies administratively (for example, in the organization of conferences, the writing of reports and studies and the preparation of the budget);
Its chairperson – the UN Secretary General – is elected by the General Assembly for a five-year mandate and is the UN's foremost representative.
Decides disputes between states that recognize its jurisdiction;
Issues legal opinions;
Renders judgment by relative majority. Its fifteen judges are elected by the UN General Assembly for nine-year terms.
A total of 128 countries, including Malaysia, on Dec 21 voted in favour of a United Nations General Assembly resolution calling for the United States to withdraw its decision to recognise Jerusalem as Israel's capital. However, US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley(Jewish) said America will go on and move its embassy to Jerusalem.
God bless UN and all the countries. justice will always privail. Isreal be free let your people be free give Palestinians their land. You were chosen people of God do not oppress others.
The United States of America, have been stabbed in the back. The land of Israel was given to them by God. The Arabs are illegal immigrants in the Holy Land, that belongs to king David,in the city of David..
Brian Wilson examines the history of leadership at the World Health Organization and speculates about their ultimate goal in moderating the so-called COVID pandemic.
The United Nation World Health Organization
Brian Wilson examines the history of leadership at the World Health Organization and speculates about their ultimate goal in moderating the so-called COVID pandemic.
The International Organization for Migration (IOM)
This Organization is moving non whites into Europe etc.
United Nations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
International Organization for Migration (IOM)
The IOM, established in 1951, is the leading inter-governmental organization in the field of migration and works closely with governmental, intergovernmental and non-governmental partners. IOM works to help ensure the orderly and humane management of migration, to promote international cooperation on migration issues, to assist in the search for practical solutions to migration problems and to provide humanitarian assistance to migrants in need, including refugees and internally displaced people. In September 2016, IOM joined the United Nations System as a related organization during the United Nations General Assembly high-level summit to address large movements of refugees and migrants.[19]
Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM)
This Organization is moving non whites into Europe etc.
The Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM) is an intergovernmentally negotiated agreement, prepared under the auspices of the United Nations, that describes itself as covering "all dimensions of international migration in a holistic and comprehensive manner".[3]
The compact was formally endorsed by the United Nations General Assembly on 19 December 2018.[4] As the Compact is not an international treaty, it will be non-binding under international law. The Crown Law Office of New Zealand published an opinion as guidance to the New Zealand Government, affirming the Compact will be non-binding, but will not be legally irrelevant, and "courts may be willing...to refer to the Compact and to take the Compact into account as an aid in interpreting immigration legislation".[5]
Everybody should check if your country has signed the agreement to allow people to come to your country with entirely different races and cultures. If your government has signed yes with no clauses, the United Nations could move other races and nationalities into your country, and they can move whites into black countries and blacks into white counties.
The United States scrapped its white European policy in 1965, and Australia did the same in March 1966.
List of countries that signed the United Nations Global Compact (take in non natives).
Un Result of the United Nations General Assembly vote for the endorsement of the Global Compact on 19 December 2018.[21]
Voted for
Voted against
Abstention from voting
Did not attend
Everybody should check if your country has signed the agreement to allow people to come to your country with entirely different races and cultures. If your government has signed yes with no clauses, the United Nations could move other races and nationalities into your country, and they can move whites into black countries and blacks into white counties.
The United States scrapped its white European policy in 1965, and Australia did the same in March 1966.
United Nations breaks its own laws by promoting the Replacement Migration into Europe
The United Nations HumanRightsCouncil (UNHRC; French: Conseil des droits de l'homme des Nations unies, CDH) is a United Nations body whose mission is to promote and protect humanrights around the world. The UNHRC has 47 members elected for staggered three-year terms on a regional group basis.
8:43 "The human rights council passed 5 resolutions against Israel, more than North Korea, Iran, and Syria combined." While that might show proof of a political bias against Israel, it shows more proof that ISRAEL IS THE BIGGEST HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATOR OF ALL TIME!!!!!!
The United Nation Human Rights Laws
Alex Jones breaks down how the U.N. is using their own police to enforce medical tyranny and censorship in the US and other countries around the world.
The development of International Law is one of the primary goals of the United Nations. The Charter of the United Nations, in its Preamble, sets the objective "to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained".
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, color, sex, language, and religion, political or other opinion.
Comment: Under this article, different racial groups from around the world who want to have self-determination cannot have it under this law. Because non-natives move into your country, you cannot discriminate against them. Because of this law, you have to let them stay, and they receive special treatment when it comes to jobs due to playing victim mode. This is laying down the foundation of destruction for the native population. When these people continue to flood that country, they will eventually outnumber the locals and replaced them.
Article 7.
All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.
Comment: Immigrants are given special protection, the police and the court system have been very lenient on them, and the local native population, the law is still harsh.
Article 10.
Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.
Comment: The media and including the human rights council have not had white people to come forth and complain about discrimination and genocide practiced against them by the politicians, media, and the United Nations.
Article 11.
Everyone charged with a penal offense has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to the law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defense.
Comment: If a woman says he raped me 30 years ago, it is presumed that guy is guilty when it is merely her word against his. Therefore he is guilty even before proven guilty.
Article 14
Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.
Comment: Many people take advantage of article 14, as by going to other countries and claiming asylum from persecution. Still, we know many of these people burn all their papers, passports, and make up a story to get into the country. And because they have no passport or documents to show what country they came from, it's harder to return them and we have no way in knowing if they're a criminal, rapist, terrorist or murderer.
The majority of people coming into Europe are not coming from war zones. They're trying to escape poverty, and they want a better life. They're coming into the country and replacing the locals and laying down the foundation of genocide and replacement, which is against the united nation's laws
White Europeans must build organizations to present Whites and other races in the United Nation, and reveal the hate against all races.
"Everyone has the right to enjoy freedom from persecution."
In Western countries, Europeans are persecuted by government policies, through the media and education system. They are not allowed a referendum on the decision to allow vast numbers of third world immigrants (many people say invasion) into European countries. If Europeans complain, they are labeled "racist", "bigots", or "extremists".
“…acts committed with the intent to destroy in whole or in part, a national ethnic, racial or religious group…”
Governments in Western countries, media, and anti-European organizations have been campaigning to genocide the Europeans worldwide by reducing their birth rates from 2.8 down to 1.6, taking their rights away, flooding their countries with third world immigration, and promotion of interracial marriage.
" Considering that all human beings are equal before the law and are entitled to equal protection of the law against any discrimination and against any incitement to discrimination"
If European Caucasians campaigned against affirmative action, busing, their genocide and the destruction of their culture, nation, they are labeled as racist. When United Nations are breaking their own laws.
"indigenous peoples have the right to the lands, territories and resources they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired. Entire country."
The majority of the world's population are indigenous to the lands they reside over. For example, the Chinese are indigenous to China, the Black population of North Western Africa are indigenous to that region, European Caucasians are indigenous to Europe and Arab Caucasians are indigenous to the Middle East and North Africa.
The United Nations indigenous laws should give equal rights to all racial groups who are the original inhabitants who have lived in the region for thousands of years. Those people who are practicing genocide within interracial marriages are effectively betraying their own people and country.
"This article concerns the subject of Indigenous People, and in particular, the Indigenous People of Britain. If you happen to be British born and bred, would you consider yourself to be an indigenous British person?"
Individual and Collective Self-Defense in Article 51 of the Charter of ...
Article 51. “Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Aug 23, 2016
Apr 20, 2017 - Individual and Collective Self-Defense in Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations - Volume 41 Issue 4 - Josef L. Kunz.
UN Intervening Domesticallly
UN Intervening Domesticallly
"Nothing in the present Charter shall authorize the United nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the jurisdiction of any state...."
UN Charter, Article 2, paragraph 7
"The United Nations should not be interfering in any state," yet, the United Nations breaks its own rules.
United States Constitution and United Nations laws.
The following verse comes to form the United States Constitution that our rights are protected by our creator (God).
"Men...are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights..."
The following verse is from the United Nations, which says our rights are not Guarantee and can be taken away at any time.
"...to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men..."
Secretary-General of the United Nations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The secretary-general of the United Nations (UNSG or just SG) is the head of the United Nations Secretariat, one of the six principal organs of the United Nations. The secretary-general serves as the chief administrative officer of the United Nations. The role of the United Nations Secretariat, and of the secretary-general in particular, is laid out by Chapter XV (Articles 97 to 101) of the United Nations Charter.
António Guterres, Jewish & Israel News | Algemeiner.com ...
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres requested the removal of a report accusing Israel of apartheid from the website of the UN body that published it, Reuters ...
Comment: some people say António Guterres is Jewish Communist.
The following article from Jewish run Breitbart News Agancy
New UN Boss Tells Europe Migration Unstoppable, And Politicians Should Ignore Voters
Drew Angerer/Getty
The incoming Secretary-General of the United Nations (UN) told a room of policymakers in Europe on Wednesday that “migration is not the problem but the solution”, and said politicians should ignore voters.
Speaking in Lisbon at the Vision Europe Summit, António Guterres said European nations have no right to control their borders and that they must instead take in floods of the world’s poorest people
“The idea that management of migration is a matter of national sovereignty is extremely limited. The truth is that in the meantime, the real controllers of international mobility are the smugglers and criminal organisations. It must be recognised that migration is inevitable and will not stop”, the socialist told the crowd of policymakers and researchers.
Regarding priorities for the UN, when he takes over from South Korean Ban Ki-moon as Secretary-General, Guterres said he already has “several items to put on the discussion table to drive positive developments” with regards to the goal of making Europe accept more migrants.
This will take place in the form of “develop[ing] legal migration opportunities as the only way to fight against criminal networks”, he hinted.
Guterres insisted that every European Union (EU) nation must be forced to “share the burden” of mass migration.
Despite having used the word “burden” to describe giving residence to large numbers of aliens, the 67-year-old went on to declare: “We must convince [Europeans] that migration is inevitable and that it is the multiethnic societies which are multicultural and multireligious who are building wealth.”
The UN’s next head acknowledged he is “not convinced that it will be easy, given the state of [public] opinion”. Calling for politicians to put “tolerance” and “reason” at the heart of their decision making, Portugal’s former prime minister urged lawmakers to prioritise “values” over respecting voters’ wishes.
He stated: “When elected officials hesitate to choose between values and the next election, I would advise them to choose values. If they go for short term [electoral gain] they will lose both, because there will always come a time when they lose an election At that point, it becomes very hard to recover the values that have been abandoned.”
Quoting Winston Churchill’s condemnation of then-Prime Minister of Britain Neville Chamberlain, in 1938, Guterres said: “You were given the choice between war and dishonour. You chose dishonour, and you will have war.”
Far from being linked to wealth, data from different European countries support the idea that non-European migrants are a net cost to nations’ treasuries. In the Netherlands, 65 per cent of non-European migrants who arrived during the 1990s are still living on welfare.
The research of University College London psychology professor Dr. James Thompson shows Europe is being harmed by mass migration from poorer countries, as on average the newcomers’ intellectual competence is much lower than that of natives.
Partly as a result of their culture and partly due to genetics, he notes that the difference in intelligence results in migrants having “lower status, lower wages and higher resentment at perceived differences.
“On the latter point, if the West cannot bear to mention competence differences, then differences in outcome are seen as being due solely to prejudice,” Thompson warns.
END
Antonio Guterres.
Antonio Guterres is a socialist and socialism/communism is the same. According to some information it appears he to be very pro-Israel, anti-Palatinate, and anti-white, this indicates he could be Zionist, Jewish, or simply both.
U.N. is using their own police to enforce medical tyranny and censorship around the world.
United Nations UNESCO Brown Man
The United Nations UNESCO wants to break down all boundaries in all countries. It is behind the multiracial, multicultural agenda in all nations, promoting third world immigration, into White Countries (Britain, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Ireland Ukraine, and Russia). The invasion into all first world nations and has continued to build upon. The original idea and concepts promoted by Coudenhove-Kalergi in the early 20th century.
The UNESCO (The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization), Brown Man pictured on the right is the ultimate goal of their long-term agenda. The screenshot of this image here was taken from a book called The Ultimate World Order by Robert H Williams (1957) and is an in-depth analysis of a book called "The Jewish Utopia" by Paul Higgins (1932). Under the image it reads:
The "UNESCO Brown Man", as we may call him or it, which I photographed from page 70 of the book UNITED NATIONS: Blueprint for Peace. The author of the book says the picture is an official UN photograph. The cutline under the picture says it "represents all of us, everyone on earth". Obviously, this raceless, characterless "man", standing on the world, is the UNESCO ideal toward which all of us must work, the blending of all the races of mankind into one composite, raceless, nationless, homeless, characterless, faceless, brown slob - utterly lost from all heritage and completely subject to the will of the Zionist "master race" - which, while producing the propaganda to cause us to blend, quickens the tribal pride of the Jews to keep them from blending. The statue resembles the "art" of and evidently was done by, the Jewish revolutionary Bernard Rosenthal who also did the famous or infamous trio, the Faceless Family. "Mr and Mrs. Faceless and Little Faceless", showing parents and a child just like the above, representing the future family.
White traitor Jew Promote Race-Mixing To Genocide All Races Including Whites and many Jews
“We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is RACIAL TENSION. By propounding into the consciousness of the DARK races, that for centuries they have been oppressed by Whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the Whites, we will endeavor to instill in the Whites, a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negros. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the PROFESSIONS, and in the world of SPORTS and ENTERTAINMENT. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to INTER-MARRY with the Whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.” AUTHOR – Israel Cohen(Zionist — Communist — Internationalist) “A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century” >Published in 1912 . On June 17, 1957, the above passage was read into the United States Congressional Record by Rep. Thomas G. Abernathy
Promote Race-Mixing To Genocide All Races
Removing White European only policy
"In 1950, it was estimated there were no more than 20,000 non-White residents in the United Kingdom, mainly in England; almost all born overseas. Just after the end of World War II, the first groups of post-war Caribbean immigrants started to emigrate and settle in London."
In the British Isles, political parties agreed on opening their doors for non-whites into the country. The government leadership would also have to go through the process of advising the British Queen. While the policy was pushed in motion behind the scenes, nobody seemed to object the idea in government, and the public was never asked.
This would also be true for all other white European countries, where political parties, royal families, and the elites, including the mainstream media, would have had to agree to start the great replacement program in all European countries.
United Nations Agenda 212030
The UN is the Number ONE enemy of all nations, and are the Military Arm of the Globalists.
The woman is a self proclaimed "liberal" and gets it wrong on a few points. The dogmatic automatism of "liberals" strikes. We call the US "libererals" communists, equivalent to European leftist loons.
The Soviet empire had "state owned corporations" dear madam called "people's firms", I witnessed it and have a good comparison.
There's video footage going around online from that very same U.N. compound in Utah. A lady was filming a U.N staff, and was told that American law doesn't apply inside because it's now "International territory"
While researching the subject, I learned that in 1979, there were 173 Nations that signed an agreement for this.
But, we DO need to get those asswipes OFF our soil, and OUT of our SOVEREIGN NATION!
Maybe Trump can repeal our signing of that agreement! The UN is the Number ONE enemy of all nations, and are the Military Arm of the Globalists.
United Nations Agenda 21
Agenda 21 is a program run by the United Nations to gain control of all land and countries under the guise of "sustainable development". It is a part of the New World Order program and universal government approach that they have been working on for a number of years.
The promotion of Agenda 21 is a way to ensure the destruction of all private property ownership, including farms, houses and business and to reduce world population. It will remove and destroy all constitutions, restrict free speech and disarm the people. When Agenda 21 is fully realised the United Nations will be in possession of all guns and subsequently there will be no opposition to their control.
Population Control and the Wildlands Project
There is a scary map which shows the Wildlands Project, part of Agenda 21. It demonstrates how fifty percent of the country, will be off-limits to humans, while the rest of the land will be highly controlled. There are little black spots on the map which show the locations of all the high rise buildings to be built.
The legislation use terms such as "sustainable population" which sounds very sweet and nice but the underlying concept is much more sinister. The actual figures coined of ultimate population is approximately 500 million which means we need to shed about 90% of our population.
Corruption has been claimed in both UNICEF and the U.N organization WHO, with many individual groups releasing media statements questioning their agenda and methods. One of the main concerns that has come up multiple times over the last 50 years is, the global scale planned parenthood type environment with the aim to reduce worldwide birth rates similar to the strategy of China and the one child policy.
Jurriaan Maessen Infowars.com Thursday, August 5, 2010
In its 1968 yearly report, the Rockefeller Foundation acknowledged funding the development of so-called “anti-fertility vaccines” and their implementation on a mass-scale. From page 51 onward we read:
“(…) several types of drugs are known to diminish male fertility, but those that have been tested have serious problems of toxicity. Very little work is in progress on immunological methods, such as vaccines, to reduce fertility, and much more research is required if a solution is to be found here.”
Tetanus vaccines given to millions of young women in Kenya have been confirmed by laboratories to contain a sterilization chemical that causes miscarriages, reports the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, a pro-vaccine organization.
A whopping 2.3 million young girls and women are in the process of being given the vaccine, pushed by UNICEF and the World Health Organization.
“We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen,” Dr. Muhame Ngare of the Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi told LifeSiteNews. “They were all laced with HCG.”
Chemical causes a woman’s body to destroy its own fetus with vaccine-induced antibodies
HCG is a chemical developed by the World Health Organization for sterilization purposes. When injected into the body of a young woman, it causes a pregnancy to be destroyed by the body’s own antibody response to the HCG, resulting in a spontaneous abortion. Its effectiveness lasts for years, causing abortions in women up to three years after the injections.
The United Nations is considering a new Internet tax targeting the largest Web content providers, including Google, Facebook, Apple, and Netflix, that could cripple their ability to reach users in developing nations.
This scheme was uncovered in a leaked 2009 Executive Board Report of the WHO's Expert Working Group on Research and Development Financing and it cited a variety of ideas involving global taxes for UN member states in order to raise vast sums of revenue:
Such a scheme could raise "tens of billions of dollars" on behalf of the United Nations' public health arm from a broad base of consumers, which would then be used to transfer drug-making research, development and manufacturing capabilities, among other things, to the developing world.
The multibillion-dollar "indirect consumer tax" is only one of a "suite of proposals" for financing the rapid transformation of the global medical industry that will go before WHO's 34-member supervisory Executive Board at its biannual meeting in Geneva.
The UN proposal represents another attempt to usurp the power of individual nations and become a one world government. It's a direct threat to national sovereignty and places a huge amount of wealth and power in an organisation that has a staggering track record of inefficiency, mismanagement, corruption and unaccountability.
In 2012 yet again they issued a statement urging countries to impose international taxes to raise more than $400 billion a year. Some examples they wish member states to implement include a carbon tax, a currency transaction tax and a billionaires tax, to offset cutbacks in aid by many countries amid global economic turmoil.
Useful Links and Videos
Alex Jones: 'UN a Nazi movement' The United Nations General Assembly has kicked off and many are wondering, do we really need the UN or other international organizations? A growing number of Americans are increasingly frustrated with international groups like the UN, IMF and World Bank. Many people are calling for the dismantling of all three organizations, including Alex Jones. He says that the United Nations is purely an evil, corrupt and wicked organization.
Truman was a Zionist Jew. He revealed his Jewish ancestry in his autobiography. His real name was Harry Solomon Truman.
For America to declare war, the president must obtain a majority vote in the United States Congress. May of the the conflicts we had around the world after the second world war have not been called wars; they're called police actions because the United Nations.
Korean War, Starts June 1950
North Korea invades South Korea.
UN Security Council: "All Members send forces."
U.S. supplies bulk of troops.
No declaration of war.
United Nations Turns Blind Eye in Killing People
In the book “The Fearful Master” by G. Edward Griffin, it mentions that during the Korean war over five thousand American men, defenceless prisoners of war, were murdered by Communist forces. Most were shot in the head and dumped into mass graves. The United Nations General Assembly refused to condemn the Reds for these acts.
It was brought to the United Nation's attention in 1952 that between 14 – 20 million political murders were committed by the communist Chinese. The United Nations listened but took no action.
During the conflict, the United Nations introduced, rules of engagement, in the Vietnam police action, there were rules America had to follow, eg.
You couldn't attack planes on the ground.
Couldn't attack trucks, if they were parked on the side of the road
Couldn't close Haiphong harbor in North Vietnam where the ships arrived with Russian military supplies.
During the Vietnam War, Americans lost over 60 thousand troops, and hundreds of thousands were injured, this all happened because of the United Nations.
First Iraq War - 1991
"The Gulf crisis has to do with a new world order. And that world order is only going to be enhanced if this newly activated peacekeeping function of the United Nations proves to be effective."
-President George h. W. Bush January 9, 1991
The United Nations has a significant influence on power and military negotiation, yet we have not seen a decrease in the number of wars. We cannot defeat the enemy because the United Nations will not allow us. Because of the United Nations wars go longer, cost more money, and the human sacrifices are more significant.
"All peoples have ethnic interests and all peoples have a legitimate right to assert their interests, to construct societies that reflect their culture, and to define the borders of their kinship group." Kevin MacDonald: A New Webzine: Introducing The Occidental Observer
1961: The United States State Department document 7277.
Gradual turn United States Military over to the United Nations
Disarm the citizenry.
UN Intervening Domesticallly
UN Intervening Domesticallly
"Nothing in the present Charter shall authorize the United nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the jurisdiction of any state...."
UN Charter, Article 2, paragraph 7
"The United Nations should not be interfering in any state," yet, the United Nations breaks its own rules.
United States Constitution and United Nations laws.
The following verse comes to form the United States Constitution that our rights are protected by our creator (God).
"Men...are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights..."
The following verse is from the United Nations, which says our rights are not Guarantee and can be taken away at any time.
"...to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men..."
Editorial Reviews
Review
Americans today can defeat the UN would-be world order without a clash of arms; Jasper recommends an educational approach. -- The New American, July 30, 2001
About the Author
For the past decade, William F. Jasper has served as a senior editor of The New American magazine, published by an affiliate of The John Birch Society. Mr. Jasper has covered firsthand many of the major UN conferences, including the 1992 "Earth Summit" in Rio de Janeiro, the 1998 Rome summit for an International Criminal Court, and the September 2000 UN Millennium Summit in new York. His previous book, Global Tyranny-Step by Step: The United Nations and the Emerging New World Order (1992), has been praised as the most authoritative and detailed expose of the UN ever written.
This book is the most all-encompassing study available about the United Nations and its ultimate goal: total world government. William F. Jasper documents the organization's calculated encroachment into virtually every aspect of our lives, including the economy, politics, the military, the environment, the family, and even religion.
The text of that Breitbart article offers hope. The facts about race keep coming out.
Quote:
Far from being linked to wealth, data from different European countries support the idea that non-European migrants are a net cost to nations’ treasuries. In the Netherlands, 65 per cent of non-European migrants who arrived during the 1990s are still living on welfare.
The research of University College London psychology professor Dr. James Thompson shows Europe is being harmed by mass migration from poorer countries, as on average the newcomers’ intellectual competence is much lower than that of natives.
Partly as a result of their culture and partly due to genetics, he notes that the difference in intelligence results in migrants having “lower status, lower wages and higher resentment at perceived differences.
The-United-Nations, World Economic Forum & World-Government
The-United-Nations, World Economic Forum & World-Government
How is this a conspiracy theory when good ole Klaus wrote a book titled "The Great Reset". So lame.
TGH2020
Sad your president is worse than Biden. ? After they demons destroy America where can people run to?
Woodrat3
The main kind of terrorism today are the fear tactics of the Main Stream Media. Should have been handled 3.5 years ago. Potus screwed up, he didn't think it was relative, and now Twitter dumps Trumps comments. Nobody is perfect I guess, but today its the leading edge of corruption.
Tante_Guddi
They want to turn us into digital beings. My only hope: They once called it agenda 21 (meaning 2021). Now it is called agenda 2030. So they are late. And i know one thing for sure: I will rather die than give into this artificial shit. Thanks for your real great work, dear Polly. Love from Germany.
Truther--the--Magnificent
We the People do NOT elect the president, according to the Constitution; the electors do. The main purpose of the "popular" vote is to condition the people for democracy, which leads to socialism. This election fraud nonsense serves the same exact purpose. The more the sheople are exposed to the idea that they vote for president, the more they will believe in and, eventually, accept a democracy over a republic.
END
Professor Klaus Schwab is a Jewish Zionist
Professor Klaus Schwab is a Jewish Zionist and is the president of the World Economic Forum.
28. 12. 2014 — Klaus schwab also known as "the clown of Davos' world economic forum (WEF)" ... Kissinger (notorious US war criminal and well known Zionist jew) as MENTOR who ... http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/prvisit.htm#VISITING
The United Nations is promoting non-white immigration into Europe, Australia, United States, Ireland, Africa and Asian countries. It breaks it's owns laws, it does not stop wars and it does not promote free speech.
The world community must come together through their different nations to challenge the validity of these permanent members of the UN Security Council who have almost absolute power in changing the tides of world politics.
United States President Trump should remove US from ALL UN mandates.
Protect Your Rights: Contact List
If you would like to protest, go through the list below, and send emails, write letters or even protest at the relevant address/es. However, please do not send abusive or threatening correspondence.
United Nations Secretary General
Fax: +1-212.963.5012
Special Envoy to the Middle East
Fax: + 32 2 285 87 52
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)
Postal address Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, (OHCHR) Palais des Nations CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
General Inquiries Phone: +41 22 917 9220 Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Media Inquires/Interview Requests Phone: +41 22 917 9383 Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
National Institutions and Regional Mechanisms Section Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Civil Society Unit Phone: +41 22 917 9656 Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Donor and External Relations Section Phone: +41 22 917 94 38 Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. Contact Form
Office of the Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide
866 United Nations Plaza, Suite 600 New York, NY 10017 USA Phone: 1 917 367 2589 Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Read 9262 times
Last modified on Wednesday, 14 February 2024 09:39
One of the most concerning aspects about the original charter of the United Nations was that one of its primary writers was a representative of the State Department - Alger Hiss. This is most worrying as Alger Hiss was incarcerated later on for being a Communist Spy for the USSR. While Hiss maintained his innocence up until the day he died, there is quite significant evidence that has now been declassified proving his guilt.
In a Time Magazine interview published August 1948, "The Watchman" (
UN Human Rights
The United Nations is considering a 
@jvarsani7090