Banner Header

Common Law Court Update 3.

Screenshot 2vis legs

We the people need to understand that the authority lies within ourselves and that the Common Law Court offers the opportunity to hold every individual accountable for their behaviour. It is no longer acceptable for people to suffer while others are rewarded for their abuse of power.

Screenshot 7common law

Download Docs

Screenshot 7final notice

What is Common Law and how can it work for you?

Common law in Australia is vested in our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 – It is the highest law of the land. This website provides information, explains procedures, and makes available documents for anyone wishing to learn about and use Common Law.

The Founding Fathers authorized three legal systems in the Constitution, first Common Law, secondly Equity Law, and thirdly Admiralty Law, which is the law of the sea. Gradually Common Law has been displaced by Equity Law until today the Common Law is rarely heard of or understood because it has been covered up and hidden away by the legal profession for very understandable business reasons. Such people are pursuing their own private agenda. In fact the Common Law is generally looked upon as obscene by those who would assume power over us, because once confronted with Common Law they lose their assumed authority.

Note: Our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 is our supreme common law. We refer to the Oxford Law dictionarynot Black’s Law Dictionary, as it refers to US Law. We operate our Common Law under The Crimes Act 1914, S.24F, 13 & 15F.

 

MISSION STATEMENT

We, the People of the Commonwealth of Australia, are peacefully and actively initiating Lawful Remedy for any harm to any man, woman, or child as a result of the Constitutional crisis currently afflicting our once-healthy, once-wealthy, once-proud nation.
We are working to convene Common Law Assemblies around the nation, and then to convene Congresses to decide on the political future of our nation, to elect true representatives of the People, to end the foreign occupation, and to assert the sovereign will of the people over our Parliament as servants of the people.
We are united in our desire to fundamentally change our nation to create a better future for all.
cirnow banner
Our information portal:
https://cirnow.com.au/

 

 

 

 

Screenshot 2john smith c

AV10 - John Smith - Common Law Courts

 Screenshot 2legal law v

Published on May 2019

A Lawful Remedy for the People :

John Smith explains why there is a need for the Common Law Court.

Natural law principles are the foundation for the Common Law Court; this court has been established as the highest court in the land. The existing judicial system is not here to ensure justice, it is here to protect vested interests and the state. We the people need to understand that the authority lies within ourselves and that the Common Law Court offers the opportunity to hold every individual accountable for their behaviour. It is no longer acceptable for people to suffer while others are rewarded for their abuse of power and trust.

Bio :

As a whistle-blower within the casino industry John made the mistake of thinking that the judicial system and government were there to protect the people. For this naivety John ended up bankrupt, homeless and unemployed. It was then the journey began with the principles of causing no harm, no loss or injury and to remain honourable within your contractual dealings.

Website : https://www.commonlawcourt.com/

snoop4truth

Dear John and friends, All of the courts in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand ARE "COMMON LAW COURTS" WHICH STILL MAKE AND WHICH STILL USE AND WHICH STILL FOLLOW THE COMMON LAW. So, if you oppose the legal system in any of those countries, THEN YOU ARE OPPOSING THE COMMON LAW, NOT SUPPORTING IT. SEE THE MAP BELOW SHOWING THE LEGAL SYSTEMS OF THE WORLD HERE. LOOK FOR THE DARK PINK-COLORED COUNTRIES.... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law#/media/File:Map_of_the_Legal_systems_of_the_world_ ... If the link does not work properly, simply do a google search for "wikipedia, map of the legal systems of the world ".

snoop4truth

THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF THE UNITED STATES IS DESIGNED SO THAT EVERY PERSON INVOLVED IS ACTUALLY PLACED INTO OFFICE (DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY) BY "WE THE PEOPLE" THROUGH THE ELECTION PROCESS (AND NOT PLACED INTO OFFICE BY THE GOVERNMENT).. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... IN THE STATE COURT SYSTEM, "WE THE PEOPLE" ACTUALLY ELECT ALL OF OUR OWN LAWMAKERS (WHO ACTUALLY WRITE ALL OF OUR OWN STATE STATUTES). "WE THE PEOPLE" ACTUALLY ELECT ALL OF OUR OWN LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY HEADS, INCLUDING ALL OF OUR OWN CITY POLICE CHIEFS, ALL OF OWN COUNTY SHERIFFS & ALL OF OUR OWN STATE GOVERNORS (ALL OF WHOM ACTUALLY DETERMINE ALL OF OUR OWN STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT POLICIES AND WHO ACTUALLY EMPLOY AND CONTROL ALL OF OUR OWN STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS). "WE THE PEOPLE" ACTUALLY ELECT ALL OF OUR OWN STATE TRIAL COURT JUDGES (WHO ENSURE THE RULES OF PROCEDURE AND EVIDENCE ARE FOLLOWED AND WHO APPLY OUR OWN STATE STATUTES WRITTEN BY OUR OWN ELECTED LAW MAKERS AND WHO ALSO APPLY THE STATE CASE LAW WRITTEN BY OUR OWN ELECTED HIGHER STATE COURTS. "WE THE PEOPLE" ACTUALLY ELECT (OR ELECT TO RETAIN) ALL OF OUR OWN STATE APPELLATE COURT JUDGES AND ALL OF OUR OWN STATE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES (WHO ACTUALLY WRITE ALL OF OUR OWN STATE CASE LAW). :"WE THE PEOPLE" ALSO ACTUALLY ELECT ALL OF OUR OWN STATE PUBLIC DEFENDERS. FINALLY, IN SOME STATES, "WE THE PEOPLE" EVEN ELECT ALL OF OUR OWN STATE PROSECUTORS (STATE'S ATTORNEYS). '....................................................................................................................................................................................................... THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM IS DESIGNED IN THE SAME WAY EXCEPT THAT OUR FEDERAL JUDGES, OUR FEDERAL PROSECUTORS AND OUR FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS ARE APPOINTED BY THOSE WHO WE ELECT TO MAKE THOSE APPOINTMENTS FOR US (THE PRESIDENT & THE SENATE). OBVIOUSLY, WE STILL ELECT THE MEMBERS OF OUR OWN CONGRESS (OUR OWN ELECTED FEDERAL LAWMAKERS) AND WE STILL ELECT OUR OWN PRESIDENT (OUR OWN ELECTED FEDERAL CHIEF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER). ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... IN BOTH THE STATE AND FEDERAL LEGAL SYSTEM, THE PARTIES TO EACH CRIMINAL CASE, THEMSELVES, EVEN GET TO PICK (EFFECTIVELY "ELECT") THEIR OWN JURIES (WHO DECIDE THE ULTIMATE QUESTION OF GUILT OR INNOCENCE IN THE CASE). IN BOTH THE STATE AND THE FEDERAL LEGAL SYSTEM, NO JUDGE IS ALLOWED TO DECIDE THE ULTIMATE QUESTION OF GUILT OR INNOCENCE IN A CRIMINAL CASE.. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... THIS IS HOW "WE THE PEOPLE" USE THE ELECTION PROCESS TO CONTROL OUR OWN STATE AND FEDERAL LEGAL SYSTEM. FOR PROOF THAT "WE THE PEOPLE" CONTROL OUR OWN STATE AND FEDERAL LEGAL SYSTEM, CLICK HERE (INCLUDES THE DEFINITION OF THE "STATE", THE "SOVEREIGN" , "SOVEREIGNTY", "CONSENT" OF THE GOVERNED AND THE "GOVERNED")... https://www.goldismoney2.com/threads/how-the-legal-system-is-designed-in-the-united-states-and-why-the-definition-of-the-state-the-sovereign-and-consent.454387/ [show less]

 

snoop4truth

"COMMON LAW" IS SIMPLY "CASE LAW". SEE ACTUAL PROOF IN ALL OF THESE LEGAL DICTIONARIES. https://www.goldismoney2.com/threads/the-confusion-about-the-common-law.426247/

 

snoop4truth

HOW THE COMMON LAW WAS MISUNDERSTOOD. The "common law" is merely "case law written by judges". It was once also called "unwritten law" SOLELY BECAUSE IT WAS NOT WRITTEN BY ELECTED POLITICIANS AND NOT PUBLISHED IN STATUTE BOOKS. BUT, THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT THE COMMON LAW WAS UNWRITTEN AND UNPUBLISHED ALTOGETHER. IT WAS (AND IT STILL IS). Common law was and still is written by appellate judges and published in "Court Reporters" (not statute or code books). But, amateur legal theorists do not know this. They mistakenly believe that the common law WAS NEVER WRITTEN IN THE FIRST PLACE and that it has been replaced by modern written law. But, this is not so. COMMON LAW IS WRITTEN LAW and is still the single most commonly used form of law in the United States and many other countries that were once part of the English Empire, including Australia and New Zealand. ALL OF THE COURTS IN ALL OF THESE COUNTRIES ARE COMMON LAW COURTS AND ALL OF THEM STILL USE THE COMMON LAW. Common law is still being made (written and published) every single day all over the globe. FOR PROOF, CLICK HERE. https://www.goldismoney2.com/threads/the-confusion-about-the-common-law.426247/ ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... THE CONFUSION ABOUT THE SOVEREIGN AND SOVEREIGNTY: Under United States law, WE (a PLURAL term) the PEOPLE (also a PLURAL term) COMBINED, COLLECTIVELY, AS A WHOLE, AS A SINGLE BODY are "sovereign". But, under United States law, NO SINGLE INDIVIDUAL, BY HIMSELF, ALONE is "sovereign". So, there is a CRITICAL legal difference between "ALL OF US" and "ONE OF US". One is sovereign and the other is not. For the actual law on this subject, CLICK HERE. https://www.goldismoney2.com/threads/the-confusion-about-the-sovereign-and-sovereignty.419526/.

snoop4truth

HOW SOVEREIGNTY WAS MISUNDERSTOOD: Under United States law, WE (a PLURAL term) the PEOPLE (also a PLURAL term) COMBINED, COLLECTIVELY, AS A WHOLE, AS A SINGLE BODY are "sovereign". But, under United States law, NO SINGLE INDIVIDUAL, BY HIMSELF, ALONE is "sovereign". So, there is a CRITICAL legal difference between "ALL OF US" on one hand and "ONE OF US". on the other hand. One is sovereign and the other is not. For the actual law on this subject, CLICK HERE. https://www.goldismoney2.com/threads/the-confusion-about-the-sovereign-and-sovereignty.419526/............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... HOW THE COMMON LAW WAS MISUNDERSTOOD. The "common law" is merely "case law written by judges". It was once also called "unwritten law" SOLELY BECAUSE IT WAS NOT WRITTEN BY ELECTED POLITICIANS AND NOT PUBLISHED IN STATUTE BOOKS. BUT, THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT THE COMMON LAW WAS UNWRITTEN AND UNPUBLISHED ALTOGETHER. IT WAS (AND IT STILL IS). Common law was and still is written by appellate judges and published in "Court Reporters" (not statute or code books). But, amateur legal theorists do not know this. They mistakenly believe that the common law WAS NEVER WRITTEN IN THE FIRST PLACE and that it has been replaced by modern written law. But, this is not so. COMMON LAW IS WRITTEN LAW and is still the single most commonly used form of law in the United States and many other countries that were once part of the English Empire, including Australia and New Zealand. ALL OF THE COURTS IN ALL OF THESE COUNTRIES ARE COMMON LAW COURTS AND ALL OF THEM STILL USE THE COMMON LAW. Common law is still being made (written and published) every single day all over the globe. FOR PROOF, CLICK HERE. https://www.goldismoney2.com/threads/the-confusion-about-the-common-law.426247

snoop4truth

Did all of the legal dictionary publishers, all of the courts, all of the law schools and all of the universities get this wrong too? Is every educated person in the entire world a "fool" too? Click on the links above. Even you are capable of understanding these simple legal principles...target="_blank">https://www.goldismoney2.com/threads/the-confusion-about-the-common-law.426247/

··

 Screenshot 2corpored

David Icke Talks To Common Law Expert John Smith - A Must Watch

Screenshot 2coomon law

David Icke

 Screenshot 2john smith

John Smith

Nemesis
 
"Give us a king everyone else has a king" Yup you wanted to live under mans law not the creators. You have to accept all things of that mans law, the law of the carbon based beast, 666, your given name is the mark of the beast. Remember you never named yourself, never claim that name to be yours. It was given to you to use, it is NOT yours. You are not a person nor a parson. You are a being of light created by the creator of all things. When you sign your name, make sure its a name that you gave yourself so that your signature (Sine Nature) is different to your given name (legal/to bind against God). So if God is not real, why do they use all these spells (words) etc to bind you from God and from God laws and Gods given rights and freedom to us all?. Ever think about that?. Because when you accept their name they gave you, you deny what you are, you become a fraud and deceased. Turn back to the creators laws, turn back to Anarchy (<< no masters, no governance outside the Creators law/ Cause No Harm, PERIOD). Full caps name is capitol punishment, caput lost the head, dead. Names on caskets are in full caps, names of those lost at sea or dead at sea, all caps, names on grave stones...all caps. This is Rome (capitol Hill) people all caps means lost all rights as a free man, all rights to family all rights completely..or so Rome claims. I got news for ROme though...you going to be CAPUT.
Read 839 times Last modified on Sunday, 19 September 2021 22:39