There is a major campaign worldwide by The Globalists to restrict free speech and the way they are doing this is if you critcizie 'Islam' as an example – you are shut down as being a 'racist' or 'extremist.' If you voice concern about open immigration policies into a Western country, then you are both 'racist' and a 'bigot.' The Socialist New World Order (NWO) use any excuse to restrict free speech. The Globalists want to introduce martial law and run the West through dictatorships where individuals have no rights for individual countries around the world. This already exists in some countries eg: China.
Billions of dollars of media 'programming' has changed the definitions of what people consider to be 'acceptable,' and what people consider to be 'not acceptable.' Political correctness shapes the waywe all communicate with each other every single day and it is only going to get worse in the years ahead. Sadly, most people simply have no idea what is happening to them.
There are many activists who have fled Islamist regimes and embraced inherent Western values of liberty, opportunity and equality. They cannot understand why we keep bending and apologizing for our way of life. With this refusal to acknowledge threats of terror and extreme ideologies, one has to wonder if it is because of this new uprising of political correctness which is going to be the West's undoing.
Governments are vigorously denying public platforms for European people to express their opinions against their own destruction through mass third world immigration and destruction of their culture. European Governments have been caught out a number of times, sacrificing their people for the sake of not offending Islam. This is highlighted mostly by the cover up of mass sexual assaults in Cologne on New Year's Eve 2015, and the Geert Wilders case, where he was put on trial for alleged incitement of hatred against immigrating Moroccans. Regardless of whether you agree with Wilder's political ideologies or not, you must agree that he is entitled to voicing his opinion publicly at his own expense. A government who actively uses its power to intimidate and silence those who disagree with them is nothing more than a dictatorship.
Europe has no first amendment rights like America has however, there is already much discussion in US Government on introducing prosecution for "hateful speech." Currently, America's first amendment prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble, or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances.
This idea of "hateful speech" so far, seems to be centred around opposition against Islam and holocaust denial. One has to question where this line is going to be drawn. Why benefit only specific groups to a law? The Globalists who make money out of the Jewish Holocaust industry are trying to restrict free speech to stop us, "We the People" criticizing them. This is just another way to intimidate the people of a nation, bullying them into silence so the corrupt unbalanced one-sided laws of bad policies being implemented.
We are challenging these corrupt laws though organizations and the Internet. Now that Mr Donald Trump has been elected as our President today, these laws may be changed in the near future: Donald Trump Campaigns to Protect the 1st Amendment
Daryl Closes IAmTheWitness.com Before The French Govt Does - Daryl Bradford Smith
Free speech is vital to a free society. When you stifle an individual's ability to voice concerns you leave them with nothing but their fists to do the talking. Another example which needs to be highlighted involves academics whose very livelihoods are enmeshed with freedom of speech when discussing and analysing issues to include both sides of a topic, ensuring full understanding.
A professor at a prestigious US University went on record stating that she had seen a dramatic upsurge in her students’ sensitivity toward even the mildest social or ideological slights; she and her fellow faculty members are terrified of facing accusations of triggering trauma – or more consequentially, violating her school’s new sexual-harassment policy merely by carrying out the traditional academic work of intellectual exploration.
“This is an environment of fear, believe it or not” she told me by way of explaining her request for anonymity. It reminds her of the previous outbreak of political correctness — “Every other day I say to my friends, ‘How did we get back to 1991?’ ” Not a Very PC Thing to Say
The impact of political correctness is too numerous to count however, their cumulative effect is clear. More than three decades of political correctness is suffocating liberty in the West. The next outcome is equally obvious; if you join the dots between each episode of political correctness, you end up with the unmistakeable image of leaders like Donald Trump and the faces of the right-wing populists whose electoral appeal is on the rise from Austria to Denmark, Finland to Hungary and more.
Those who write off Trump and other right-wing politicians as redneck extremists and their supporters as uneducated idiots who want to sit on their white privilege, are missing the big picture. The stifling imposition of political correctness by the political, media and cultural elite, have created these figureheads as they do not give a better option. People may not agree with everything Trump says, but maybe they are liberated by a politician who says what he wants, after years of being told what to think, what to say, what not to say and what to feel. It is refreshing to listen to a man who will not have a bar of the myriad of political correctness filters applied to every field of life.
Politically Correct (PC), police have already censored the works of great authors, Mark Twain and Enid Blyton as part of a global battalion of self-appointed paternalists.
One can argue that the biggest 'safe space' is in the Muslim world. For the last thousand years, Islamic scholars have insisted that there is nothing to debate and their beliefs and ideals are final. This lack of debate and discussion has meant that more books are translated into Spanish in a single year, than books translated into Arabic in the last thousand years. Free speech and an innovative society are inextricably linked and a culture that cannot hear an opposing word on race, gender or religion is one that will not innovate and will surely stagnate and decline.
Free speech has been trampled because so called pro-white organizations never built a community based group or good relationships with other racial groups in order to bring in funds that would help cover legal costs to challenge the Establishment and the rogue Polititicans. We have discussed many times now, how important it is to set up organizations like the Jewish Anti-Defamation League in order to defend our needs in the Supreme Court and International Courts. We are now paying the high price for this not being done, so an urgent need for these organizations to be developed is right now. Look at the laws below that are here to protect your rights, yet they are being abused:
The United Nations universal declaration of human rights:
"Everyone has the right to enjoy freedom from persecution."
United Nations convention on the prevention and punishment of genocide:
“…acts committed with the intent to destroy in whole or in part, a national ethnic, racial or religious group…”
United Nations International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
"Considering that all human beings are equal before the law and are entitled to equal protection of the law against any discrimination and against any incitement to discrimination"
United Nations Indigenous Laws Declaration, Article 26
"Indigenous peoples have the right to the lands, territories and resources they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired. Entire country."
The EU is based on the values of human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities.
Trying individuals for genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Dialectical thinking means everything is back to front.
Racism: The media and government call white people racist when they are fighting for their rights but does not call non-whites racist; the media are the real racist.
Bigotry: The media and political parties call white people bigots and yet do not allow them to defend themselves against false accusations; this is media bigotry.
Extremist: The media calls white people and black people extremist, if they are challenging the media’s lies; media are the real extremists.
The media and politicians accuse white people of being extremists, when white people campaign for their civil rights; these accusations are the real bigotry and racism.
This also holds true when media wish to lie or hide facts, some examples being:
- They say they are fighting racism when in fact they are creating racism.
- They say they are fighting bigotry when in fact they are hiding information from the public.
- They say they are campaigning against genocide when in fact they create and promote inter-racial marriages which will eventually lead to genocide.
- The media talks about American Indians and Australian Aborigines and how whites took their land, while at the same time allowing non-whites into European lands.
- The Media say they are fighting for free speech, when in fact they oppose free speech.
Hegelian Dialectic (Problems Reaction Solution)
This is a commonly used mass mind control system. It is a popular strategy used when they wish to change laws that would not usually be accepted otherwise:
1. Create a problem – examples include Terrorism, financial crisis, etc.
2. Manufacture a reaction – Let the mainstream media only broadcast/print the side of the problem they want to show.
3. Provide a solution – Wars, corporate tax-cuts, welfare budget cuts, etc.
The media certainly does not tell the full story when reporting on many global issues. They do not talk about indigenous rights for the "majority," only when it comes to minority groups.