Banner Header

The Breakup of the Soviet Union Explained

Screenshot 1breakup

The Breakup of the Soviet Union Explained

JoeShit TheRagMan

To avoid offending people from Finland, I will just delete the country from history
Rev. Andy H.
The Soviet Union was declared dead in 1991 so that it would forever be 69 years old.
Rat Ghost
"Mr. Gorbachev, Tear...down... this... wall!!" ~ Ronald Wilson Reagan at the Berlin Wall, 6/12/87
Excellent History lesson! Thank you so much! This will help me to fight against the Marxist nonsense that is infecting our youth in the United States
As Stalin himself once said, “Dark humor is like food, not everyone gets it.”
British Enough
Correction: The Tsar was overthrown by a liberal faction, who created a provisional government. A few months in, the Bolsheviks overthrew this provisional government, removing a lot of their legitimacy. They weren’t even the only communist party in Russia at the time. The Mensheviks believed in a gradual transition to communism.
Edit: I forgot that the Socialist Revolutionary Party was another far-left socialist party that rivaled the Bolsheviks.
Stanislav Sushko
Nice video. Small addition: there were 2 revolutions in 1917: 1st have removed Emperor by Socialist, created State Duma (Parliament) and then in November 1917 bolsheviks guided by Lenin have captured power in the country, dismissed parliament and established Labour's Dictate
"At the start of 1989, the Eastern European countries were all considered stable socialist countries. By the beginning of 1990, all Warsaw Pact nations had experienced a political revolution..." It's shocking HOW FAST things went from "everything is fine" to "the face of the world is now completely different". Makes you wonder how wrong those "it can never happen here" people likely are...
Twisted Egg
Im from lithuania and I must say this video was really well made except a few parts which revolve lithuania. 1. You used the Pre WWII border whithout the capital which is hated by lithuanians. 2. You glossed over the January 13th incident where the soviet union tried to gain control of the TV tower and ended up killing 14 civilians and injuring hundreds 3. And you completly ignored the baltic way in 1989
Tom Pearse
The Bolsheviks didnt overthrow the Tsar, important distinction. They overthrew the liberal provisional government which had overthrown the Tsar
Steve Conway
Great video, but their is an error. Around the 2:06 mark you mention that Tsar Nicholas II was overthrown by the Bolsheviks. That wasn't true. The tsar was actually overthrown in the February (1917) Revolution. It was this provisional government the Bolsheviks eventually overthrew in the October (1917) Revolution. It was after that 2nd revolt that they murdered the tsar and his entire family.
 Juris Krumgolds
Also as a Latvian I'm truly disappointed you didn't mention the Baltic Way. It was a peaceful protest in Baltic countries in 1989 when people of all three Baltic states of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia made a 675 km long human chain of over a two million people holding hands. A truly spectacular event!
I mean, Finland wasn't technically an axis power, but they fought with the Germans against the Soviets for obvious reasons. That said, removing Finland altogether from the map is fucking hilarious, I love it
 MarkYuri PH
"anyone who doesn't regret the passing of the soviet union has no heart.Anyone who wants it restored has no brain" -Vladimir putin
32:32 ?? Georgia declared independence on 9th April 1989 but we celebrate independence day on May 26th cause Republic of Georgia was created on May 26th back in 1921 ✌


Dr. Saul Krugman injected disabled children with live hepatitis virus.

Screenshot 2truth is power

Jews Experiment on Children (Fed Hepatitis Infected Feces), yet Fabricate 'Nazi Atrocities'

With some Jews you don’t need to do any further research or editing to show what they’re like — the Wikipedia entry by itself is more than enough to understand their “ethics.” But we should say was more than enough; the 2014 text used here has been toned down a great deal by today’s Wikipedia.


Share to TwitterShare to RedditShare to VkontakteShare to MessengerShare to TelegramShare to WhatsAppShare to Email

THE SON OF Russian Jewish immigrants, Saul Krugman was born in the Bronx on April 7, 1911. He began his undergraduate studies at Ohio State University in 1929 and, after taking time off following his junior year to earn money so he could complete his studies, graduated from the University of Richmond in 1934.

Dr. Krugman began his medical studies at the Medical College of Virginia and later went on to pursue research at the New York University (NYU). Krugman was the first to distinguish hepatitis A from hepatitis B and made great strides in describing their different characteristics and behaviors. While examining blood samples from patients with hepatitis at NYU, Krugman discovered that heating blood containing hepatitis B would kill the virus while preserving an antibody response when used as a vaccine.

From 1958-1964 Dr. Saul Krugman injected disabled children with live hepatitis virus. After infecting the children, Krugman would then experiment with developing a vaccine to be used to protect United States military personnel from the chronic and often fatal disease. In addition, feces were taken from institutionalized children with hepatitis and put it in milkshakes, which were then fed to newly admitted children. This, despite the morbidity and mortality of the disease, which causes cirrhosis of the liver more frequently than excessive consumption of alcohol. Poor families were often coerced into allowing their children to be included in these “treatments” as a prerequisite for admission into the state school which was the only option for working-class families needing care for a child suffering from mental retardation or other disability. (“Surely, the duress upon these parents with children so defective as to require institutionalization was far greater than the duress on prisoners given tobacco or paid or promised parole for their cooperation.” Paul Ramsey, ethicist. Dr. David D. Rutstein adheres to a stricter standard in regard to research on infectious hepatitis: “It is not ethical to use human subjects for the growth of a virus for any purpose.”)

Staff at Willowbrook, who later quit in disagreement or disgust over the experiments, testified to the pressure put on families and the false reassurances they got from the doctors. When the school was finally closed, the children who once resided there were often refused entry to regular school’s programs for Special Needs Children because they were infected with the hepatitis virus. Krugman was not only never censured for these abuses, but was awarded the Lasker Prize for Medicine. In the words of the Lasker Committee, without any mention of the children who gave their health and lives for Krugman’s ego:

“Dr. Krugman’s most far-reaching achievement concerns viral hepatitis. In a long and elegant sequence of studies beginning in the mid-1950s, he proved that “infectious” (type A) hepatitis, transmitted by the fecal-oral route, and the more serious “serum” (type B) hepatitis, transmitted by blood, body secretions, and sexual contact, were caused by two immunologically distinct viruses.” These studies were sponsored by the Armed Forces Epidemiological Board, Office of the Surgeon General, U.S. Army and approved by the New York State Department of Mental Hygiene. The ethics of the Willowbrook Studies have been widely debated.

In early 1972, Geraldo Rivera, an investigative reporter for television station WABC-TV in New York City, conducted an investigation of Willowbrook (after a series of articles in the Staten Island Advance and Staten Island Register newspapers), uncovering a host of deplorable conditions, including overcrowding, inadequate sanitary facilities, and physical and sexual abuse of residents by members of the school’s staff.

In 1972, Krugman became the president of the American Pediatric Society. [And Krugman — and Koprowski, mentioned below — are just a minuscule fraction of truly sick Jews in this heavily-promoted field.]

Originally appeared at: White Biocentrism

Share to TwitterShare to RedditShare to VkontakteShare to MessengerShare to Telegram







The Leo Frank Case

  • Sunday, 18 July 2021 06:16
Screenshot 1lynching
 Father of ADL, Leo Frank (Jewish), tried to Pin Murder on 2 Black Men.
Nation of Islam Research Group

The Leo Frank Case: Documented Findings

The Leo Frank Case: Documented Findings


The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Volume Three: The Leo Frank Case, The Lynching of a Guilty Man is a 536-page study referenced with thousands of footnotes and illustrated with maps, diagrams, and graphics that touch on every aspect of this controversial case. Here are a few of The Secret Relationship’s documented findings (and the page numbers where full references can be found):

  • Frank was not targeted by an unruly mob. A 23-member grand jury that included five prominent members of the Jewish community voted for the indictment of Leo Frank. In other words, they all believed there was enough evidence to convict Leo Frank as the sole murderer of Mary Phagan. (See page 52, notes 102-106.)

  • The claim that a mob chanted “Hang the Jew or we’ll hang you” at the trial is simply false. The ADL’s own expert, author Steve Oney, told the Jewish Journal: “It didn’t happen.…Jews were accepted in the city, and the record does not substantiate subsequent reports that the crowd outside the courtroom shouted at the jurors: ‘Hang the Jew or we’ll hang you.’” (See pages 163-64, 173-187.)
  • Leo Frank himself told a Jewish newspaper publisher, “Anti-Semitism is absolutely not the reason for this libel [murder conviction] that has been framed against me. It isn’t the source nor the result of this sad story.” (Page 142.)
  • Anti-Semitism was virtually absent from the case, but anti-Black racism was brutally present: Leo Frank, as leader of B’nai B’rith, publicly and openly referred to Blacks as “niggers.” His defense attorneys used the word “nigger” and other racist slurs dozens of times in court. His main attorney told the jury: “If you put a nigger in a hopper, he’ll drip lies.” And: “Is it possible that you Anglo-Saxon men have forgotten the nature of the negro?….Conley is a plain, beastly, ragged, filthy, lying nigger. Have I overstated that?” Another of Frank’s many attorneys addressed the jury, stating that Conley came from “a law-breaking race.” (Pages 121-23, 128-29, 131-33, 362.)
  • Frank argued in court that the many Black witnesses should not be believed—simply because they were Black—and that “negro testimony” was by definition inferior and unreliable. Further, Frank argued to the all-white jury of his peers that murder, rape, and robbery were “negro crimes” and thus, he, a white man, could not have committed the murder of Mary Phagan. (Pages 124-136.)
  • Atlanta police did not “frame” Frank; nor did they arrest him because he was Jewish. Both private detective agencies hired by Frank concluded that Leo Frank was the murderer of Mary Phagan. Another attorney hired by Frank similarly found and stated openly that his client was guilty. (Pages 31-34, 47-48, 50-52, 65-66, 91 note 187, 147, 247.)

  • Jim Conley was the second Black person that Leo Frank publicly accused of Mary Phagan’s murder. Newt Lee, the night watchman who found the body in the factory basement, was actively targeted by Frank’s hired private eyes. They actually planted a blood-soaked shirt in the innocent Black man’s home, and then told the police where they could find that damning “evidence.” At the same time, Frank altered Lee’s work time card in order to make Lee the prime suspect. (Pages 35-44.) Frank’s attorney, the famous Luther Rosser, had this exchange in open court with the medical expert, related to the planted bloody shirt:

Rosser: The shirt had the odor of blood on it when you first got it, didn’t it?


Rosser: Then, wouldn’t the odor of blood have killed the odor of nigger?


Rosser: Then, if a nigger had just put on his shirt and had taken it off in an instant, your nose would “get him”?

Have you ever smelled a negro, Mr. Rosser?

Rosser: More than you ever smelled. I was smelling them before you were born. [Pages 134-135.]

  • Leo Frank’s own Black cook, Minola McKnight, signed an affidavit saying she overheard Frank’s wife and mother discussing how Frank had confessed to the murder. She (and her husband) also gave damning evidence of Frank’s movements on the day of the murder that conflicted with Frank’s already weak alibi. (Pages 34, 378-79, 423-428.)
  • Leo Frank was caught lying so often and so unapologetically that he was actually his own worst enemy. He refused to take an oath on the Bible, and then refused to be cross-examined by prosecutors. But James Conley withstood sixteen hours of cross-examination—under oath. (Pages 92ff, 122, 136-140, 362-382.)

  • After Frank’s conviction powerful Jewish leaders rallied to his defense, but in private documents they admitted that they could not stand Frank’s personality and that he probably was guilty. Albert Lasker ran the top advertising agency in America and financed Frank’s legal defense. His private view of the B’nai B’rith president was harsh and disturbing: “It was very hard for us to be fair to him [Frank], he impressed us as a sexual pervert.”(Pages 216-217, 254-255, 322.)
  • Frank’s main attorney admitted in open court that Frank’s lewd behavior was “a sign that we are getting more broad-minded…[D]eliver me from one of these prudish fellows that never looks at a girl and never puts his hands on her….” So powerful was the testimony of twenty adolescent girls about Leo Frank’s sexual harassment at the factory that none of his attorneys dared to cross-examine them—not one. (Pages 107-123.)
  • Frank supporters tried to hire a Black woman to slip Conley some poison. She identified the plotters in open court. (Pages 262-263.)
  • Frank was convicted in Atlanta, but most of the 13 appeals occurred outside Atlanta, and every one of those courts—including the US Supreme Court—upheld the conviction. (Pages 276-277, 282.)

  • Prosecutor Hugh Dorsey has been portrayed as an “anti-Semite,” but it was Dorsey who allowed Blacks to testify at the trial, an unprecedented advancement in civil rights. Leo Frank’s attorneys fought this tooth and nail, and did everything they could to keep Blacks from participating in any part of the trial. It was Frank’s attorneys—not Georgia prosecutors—who used their power to eliminate Blacks from the jury pool. Dorsey later became governor of Georgia, whereupon he forcefully condemned the racial violence in his state and in America. The NAACP declared that Governor Dorsey’s stand “greatly enhanced the significance of the anti-lynching crusade.” Frank’s B’nai B’rith—and all Jewish organizations—were totally absent from the anti-lynching movement. In fact, Leo Frank’s main appeals attorney, Louis Marshall, as president of the American Jewish Committee, fought to undermine anti-lynching legislation, calling it “unconstitutional” and a violation of “state’s rights.” (Pages 88, 478-479.)
  • Several of Frank’s strongest advocates—including his main lawyer and the man who financed his legal appeals—were both Jewish and open and active members of the American eugenics movement. A generation later Hitler would draw inspiration for his anti-Jewish policies from American eugenicists. (Pages 217, 221-222.)
  • Pro-Frank embellishers have claimed that “thousands” of Jews fled Atlanta, but this is a complete myth. Jewish demographers show that the Jewish population of Atlanta actually increased over the weeks, months, and years after the Frank episode. (Pages 330-344.)
  • Mysteriously, in 1982 a “witness” named Alonzo Mann materialized, claiming that he was at the factory in 1913 on the day of the murder and saw Conley carrying the body of Mary Phagan. The Nation of Islam meticulously examined those claims and shows conclusively that Mann had given many conflicting stories—in 1913 and in 1982—that are irreconcilable with the known facts and that the aged Mann was very likely coaxed by Frank’s advocates into making his 1982 claims. (Pages 435-464.)

Amazon Empire: of Jeff Bezos

Screenshot 1jeff bezos

Amazon Empire: The Rise and Reign of Jeff Bezos (full film) | FRONTLINE

An inside look at how Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos built one of the largest and most influential economic forces in the world — and the cost of Amazon’s convenience.

F Liu

Question: Is Amazon paying no U.S. corporate taxes in 2018 and 2019, helping U.S. postal (Lost $3.8 billions 2018) or "using it" to deliver made in China goods?
Important details are left out of this docu, which indicates a significant bias especially when dealing with the battle that happened between the major book publishers like hachette and Amazon. hachette wanted to change the contract from wholesale pricing where amazon pays a set wholesale price to the agency model where the publisher sets the price and amazon gets a cut. The reason hachette and other major publishers wanted to switch to agency pricing was to stop amazon from selling ebook best sellers at $9.99.. Ultimately, hachette and other book publishers and Apple were sued by the USA government for price fixing, anti-trust violations and trying to keep prices high. The publishers all settled with the US government. Apple went to trial and lost. This is one of a number of important details that was left out of this "documentary",
"In 2019, Bezos was being criticized because The Washington Post (which Bezos owns)."

 return to updates Jeff Bezos

Yavener is another Jewish name. The couple were married by Rabbi Bayar. That gives us enough to go on concerning that question with Bezos. Despite that, no one else on the internet appears to know Bezos is Jewish. Jew or not Jew tells us he isn't Jewish. Even Stormfront denies it. Weird.

Screenshot 11no more china trade

China vs The West: Does Trade War Spell End To Made-In-China Goods? | When Titans Clash 3 - Part 1/2





Screenshot 11best looking in front

4K-Rare 2019 National Day military parade female militia formation training

 Screenshot 11chinese pi

Gao Puyu, a female pilot of a heavy fighter-bomber, rewrote the history of the Chinese Air Force

 Screenshot 11uighytrewq


Uyghur female soldiers visited 26 countries, and foreigners praised China, I am proud to be Chinese

 Uyghur female soldiers visited 26 countries with warships, sailing more than 250,000 nautical miles, and the track can circle the equator 12 times!

Guli Nigel Eskar, Uyghur, girl from Aksu, Xinjiang, female soldier of the Chinese Navy, helmsman of the comprehensive supply ship Chaohu. He has participated in major missions such as Malaysia Airlines' search and rescue, long-distance voyage visits and escort missions. He has visited 26 countries, 5 times accompanied the ship to the Gulf of Aden, and sailed more than 250,000 nautical miles on the warship, which is equivalent to circling the equator 12 times!

In December 2012, Gu Li stood out from more than 8,000 competitors and became a female naval battleship soldier. The elimination rate of the batch was as high as 96%. In July 2022, in a common subject competition held by the whole ship, Gu Li won the first place in the preliminaries, and she won the second place in the final, which means that Gu Li defeated 99% of the male soldiers.

Gu Li is currently with the 41st naval escort taskforce, driving the Chaohu ship to carry out escort missions in the Gulf of Aden.


Brutal but must! Rare Documentary/Training of Chinese Frontier Female Recruits

 Screenshot 11whites in chinese army


Brutal but must! Rare Documentary/Training of Chinese Frontier Female Recruits The women's army composed of 7 ethnic groups, the Chinese female soldiers stationed in the Pamirs


Screenshot 10chinese musicvbn

【超級夜總會】蕭煌奇登台羅時豐卻挑戰模仿他!模仿豬哥亮太爛!謝金燕衝上台逼逼逼?! #9 120107


Screenshot 8this is crazy

China’s Navy Develops Worlds Largest Nuclear Super Ship

China, the world's second most powerful navy, has unveiled plans for the largest nuclear-powered supership, described as a floating city. In this episode, we delve into the revolutionary design of this supercarrier, set to challenge naval doctrines established over a century. Rear Admiral Ma Weiming, a renowned naval expert, presents a groundbreaking blueprint that promises to overturn traditional combat formations. The supership's state-of-the-art naval combat system features advanced electromagnetic weaponry, including railguns and lasers, offering pinpoint accuracy and unmatched firepower. What's more, this vessel boasts a nuclear-powered electrical system, ensuring sustained energy and extended operational capabilities without refueling. Join us to understand the potential impact of this technological marvel on global naval dynamics. Discover how this supership could reshape naval engagements and extend mission capabilities, redefining the future of maritime warfare. Stay informed on the latest advancements in naval power

Screenshot 8china vb

 Dems Back China's AI Organ Harvesting Death Camps

Dems Back China's AI Organ Harvesting Death Camps

 Mitchell Gerber of joins The Alex Jones Show to expose the organ harvesting death camps in China with the support of top American leftists.



Screenshot 7checkmate

Scott Ritter: Kissinger's China Visit DESTROYS Fake U.S. Diplomacy


We must acknowledge US President Richard M. Nixon as the principal visionary and main driving force behind the US rapprochement with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in 1972. Although he had a reputation as an arch anti-Communist, Nixon saw that peace and stability in the world could not be achieved without the active participation of the PRC and its then 800M people. He clearly articulated this point in his 1967 Foreign Affairs article “Asia after Vietnam” which was published before he became the US President.

We must acknowledge US President Richard M. Nixon as the principal visionary and main driving force behind the US rapprochement with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in 1972. Although he had a reputation as an arch anti-Communist, Nixon saw that peace and stability in the world could not be achieved without the active participation of the PRC and its then 800M people. He clearly articulated this point in his 1967 Foreign Affairs article “Asia after Vietnam” which was published before he became the US President. In 1969 when Nixon took office, official US policy was to isolate, contain and ignore “Red China” (as the PRC was then called in the US). This was the consensus view of the US Foreign Policy Establishment and the US Political Establishment, including that of the Republican Party. Although the logic of normalizing relations with the PRC was eminently obvious—after all the Communists did win the Chinese Civil War—the US political Establishment was dead set against it. Even senior diplomat George F. Kennan (who later warned that expanding NATO would result in war with Russia) counseled Nixon NOT to re-open relations with the PRC. Conservative politicians, including Sen.
Barry Goldwater and California Governor Ronald Reagan and influential commentators such as William F. Buckley strongly opposed opening relations with “Red China.” When Nixon first told Kissinger in January 1969 that he wanted to open relations with the PRC, Kissinger initially said that Nixon was crazy. However, it didn’t take too much convincing for Kissinger to see the obvious logic and advantages of normalizing relations with the PRC. Nixon had to do a tremendous amount of political work to mollify the Conservatives, and convince the Political Establishment as well as the American people that re-establishing relations with the PRC was the right thing to do. His 1972 visit to China was carefully choreographed as a media campaign to make the case to the American people for normalizing relations with the PRC. At the time, this was extremely politically risky and could have easily backfired. There were many people in the US State Department who wanted to derail Nixon’s efforts, including Marshall Green, US Deputy Secretary of State. But Nixon and his team pulled it off. None of this is to diminish or belittle the contribution of Mr. Kissinger, whose efforts and expertise were critical in re-establishing relations with China. A lesser diplomat could not have done it. But Mr. Kissinger’s job in negotiating with Zhou Enlai and Mao Zedong was the relatively easy part. The difficult part was convincing a large number of important and influential people in the US Political Establishment to change their minds about “Red China.” Richard Nixon did the political heavy lifting required to make that happen.

Screenshot 7chinainter war

Chinese Entry Into Ukraine War Confirmed? Sensational Reveal In New Report | 'Beijing Arming Russia'


It's true most Chinese like and respect Henry Kissinger because he was responsible for opening the relationship between China and the US and the world.

Screenshot 5united states of asia

China calls for Japan, South Korea to unite and move away from Western ideals

 China's Foreign Affairs Commission Director Wang Yi has called on his Japanese and South Korean counterparts to unite in revitalizing the Asian continent and move away from their Western ideals. Wang Yi also accused 'certain major powers outside the region' of exaggerating ideological differences in order to sow confrontation.

It is about Time South East Asia stood United Europe used You for the Drug and Sex Slave Business for almost 200 yrs. now. Vietnam should be the Center of this Union of Independent States because of Their Extreme Experience with the USA and how They Successfully Defeated the USA in Battle. Ho Chi Minh would be so Proud of You if You Succeed at doing this Endeavor and Finish off the USA Slave Trade in Asia.

 Shameful Wasteful China - BitChute


Screenshot 4subs

Which Country Has the Most Submarines in 2023? Submarine Fleet Strength by Country



Screenshot 4airbuss in china

Airbus Announces Plans to Build New Jet Factory in China Amid Apple's Retreat


China- How Does China's Government Work?

Screenshot 32how does china work\

How Does China's Government Work?

China's government is really interesting. Their government, like the US government, is broken down into levels: National > Provincial > District > City/Town/Village. At the lowest level, officials are elected democratically to govern and represent the village or city. They then get "promoted' up the levels based on their performance at the lower levels till they get appointed to the national level of government by the chairman. It's nice because everyone enters the government through democratic election, but no one can jump straight to the national level without first showing competence at the lower levels, so everyone running the country at the national level all understand from experience how the government operates at every level and, as a result, they are good at delegating power out to the lower levels. For a country of over 1.2 billion people, it's definitely an efficient form of government.
An important thing to add is that the president of China isn't always the man in charge. The real power in communist China resides in the standing committee of the politburo (or the leadership of the communist party). All other parts of the Chinese government are merely there to approve off what the politburo decides, to create legitimacy. The president only has power if he is a member of the politburo, like Mao Zedong and Xi Jinping, without power in the politburo they are extremely weak. To become a member of the politburo someone must become a member of the communist party and rise through the ranks using guanxi (good personal relations with higher leadership).
Oh this video is dead wrong. China is just an authoritarian version of global centrist trend, including Democratic and Republican establishment and essentially most traditional political parties. China is nothing like North Korea, because the Chinese government is strictly capitalist, while the North Korean bureaucrats are not allowed to push for pro-market reforms(which benefit themselves primarily) because that threatens Kim's power. So Chinese government is in collusion with global capitalists and capitalist nations like the US, while North Korea is doing everything to prevent global capitalism from toppling it... this video tbh looks like its made by some 10 year old kid.
Not communist. China is closer to NATIONAL SOCLIALISM than Germany was.
Wrong: China IS NOT a "single political party" state. No, it isn't. There are nine political parties in China. You can vote for all of them there. Look for this in Wikipedia. United Front (People's Republic of China)
I go here so easy . If I want ,I can get through the wall of china. When I go out ,I see so many harm to china . Now I know the wall of Internet is right.
Chinese govt works like a huge company...and their leaders are selected/promoted based on their performance.
You should do a video on what's wrong with the education system of the western world (mainly U.S.A. and Europe) why students have to work so hard for information that's barely usefull.
I think most western people know little about China. In China, the most important thing is to develop economy. A stable social environment is the basis of economic growth. The single party is the most effective way to realize rapid economic growth and social stability. In such a complex world, the concept of democracy is a little bit outmoded. A better concept would be good govermancy. In western coutries, people used to think all the things different from their model are wrong. It seems that the western countries should change their minds.
Censorship of media is a good thing, because media always shows you the bad things, and creates disturbance and unrest in society. And for your kind information I am from India and I don't like the Indian system.


That's right, china government works like a huge company, the leaders selected/promoted have very professional experience in different field, that’s why china becomes powerful quickly in a short time, but in US democracy system, US people may elect stupid leaders only depend on what they said.

Simon LuVan

Chinese government is run by engineers, while US is run by lawyers. Chinese leaders are handpicked based on their previous performance (GDP mostly) while US leaders are elected based on their speech ability. Which one will produce better results in the long run? I think it's quite obvious.
China has a long history. Many dynasties in ancient China collapsed because of Party struggle. A party must represent the interests of some people. Dynasty needs are the interests of the whole society. In fact, western political parties legalized party and government and consumed social forces. China often said that governing the world is to safeguard the interests of all people, the Communist Party. Actually speaking, the Party Constitution represents the vanguard of the working class, the most advanced productive forces and the interests of the vast majority of the Chinese people. That is to say, in governing the world, China today is actually a combination of Marx and Chinese culture. The advantage of China's system is that it can reform itself. If China can gradually solve the problem of political struggle at the top level, it will be a long time. Ancient Chinese dynasties generally exceed 300 years, the history of the founding of the United States is only 200 years, China's 5000 years, and China's wisdom has a long history.
I am an indian. And democracy sucks here. To take any decision , it takes 50 years here. You can take decision only when there is a majority party. Decision making process is always hindered by opposition for the sake of appeasement of their vote banks. Communist china has lifted 300 millions people out of poverty. India has pushed 100 millions into poverty. Only idiots become leaders in democracy. An average person has idea about country economy, foreign policy, etc. They votes on the basis of emotions and appeasement. Plato has said more about this.

China- EXPOSING the truth in China

Screenshot 27china truth

She's EXPOSING the truth in China, and they're furious | Redacted Conversation w Vanessa Beeley

 Vanessa Beeley is an independent journalist who is exposing the shocking propaganda around the Uigher oppression in China. You might be stunned to learn the truth you've never heard before. Clayton Morris sits down with Vanessa to talk about the government campaign to turn China into enemy number one. #uighers

Support Vanessa's great journalism right here on her Telegram channel:


Screenshot 27remove chinese g

Meanwhile in China: The forced removal of former CCP Chairman Hu Jintao

Screenshot 27china n

Happy Chinese National Day!


Screenshot 1china power

The western world transferred power and prosperity to China.

China: Power and Prosperity -- Watch the full documentary

As China has risen in prosperity, influence and military strength, what are the social, economic and political forces at play? Come along with PBS NewsHour as we travel around the globe to explore the emerging superpower and its relationship with the United States.

"China: Power and Prosperity" covers the country’s powerful leader, his signature foreign policy, U.S.-China trade and technology wars, how Chinese technology helps stifle dissent, and more. A collaboration with the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting, PBS NewsHour conducted more than 70 on-camera interviews in eight Chinese cities and across eight countries.


Globalist helped Communism in China.

“October 1 1949, Mao Tse Tsung declared the founding of the People’s Republic of China in Tiananmen Square, Beijing. He was funded by Rothschild created Communism in Russia and also the following Rothschild agents: Solomon Adler, a former United States Treasury official who was a Soviet Spy; Israel Epstein, the son of a Jewish Bolshevik imprisoned by the Tsar in Russia for trying to ferment a revolution there; and Frank Coe, a leading official of the Rothschild owned IMF. Jews were behind the rise to power of Mao Tse Tung, the communist dictator of China, who tortured and murdered tens of millions of Chinese (mostly Christians) during his brutal reign. Sidney Shapiro, an American Jew, was in charge of China’s propaganda organ. Another Jew, Israel Epstein, was Mao’s Minister of Appropriations (Finance).”

The Crimes of Breaker Morant | The Retrial (Australian History Documentary) | Timeline


In the Age of AI (full film) | FRONTLINE

Screenshot 1age of ai

When stupid politicians have power over artificial intelligence.

In the Age of AI (full film) | FRONTLINE

A documentary exploring how artificial intelligence is changing life as we know it — from jobs to privacy to a growing rivalry between the U.S. and China. FRONTLINE investigates the promise and perils of AI and automation, tracing a new industrial revolution that will reshape and disrupt our world, and allow the emergence of a surveillance society.

Screenshot 1google australia

 Jim Mooney

The problem is when really stupid politicians have power over really smart AI.

Lawrence Ekdahl

I see nothing good about it There will no longer be any freedom of thought and everyone will be enslaved.
June DeRose
They have already passed facial recognition , they are implanting us with chips now. As of this writing many US companies are asking their employees to be chipped.!! The crazy thing is people are getting them as a convenient tool to scan into computers etc ! In Sweden 4,000 people thus far are chipped so not to use currency , plus have medical info. Now with Covid 19 everyone will be looking for a vaccine . This is when Gates and the others will chip everyone getting vaccines. AI will destroy us if we don't stop it now !!!
BLZ Moto
I just found this video and saved it in my favorites to watch later but I've read a few comments in reference to goggle. I read an article a few years ago where goggle stated they want a chip in everything. Silverware, coffee cups, drinking glasses, counter tops, pots and pans EVERYTHING. Their motive??? They claimed they want to know what you do in the mornings. What type of coffee do you drink and how much. What kind of cereal do you eat or what do you have for breakfast every morning. Their claim for this knowledge is so they can target specific ads to each household. They are basically admitting that they want to spy on every household. Let this sink in for a minute.
Myra Aragon
This AI will replace everything in the near future...including those that created it. Many will lost their jobs because they will be replace by AI...We will all lose our privacy because everything in us is monitored. They can see who's the sick and not. The perfect genes and those with defects.See now that we're all in Physical distance because of pandemic..We all turn to computers and smart phones. All the data gathered will be use. (I was thinking that WHAT IF? this pandemic thing is just a dry-run to "RUN" an AI.) And they'll create another "god's eye" . I'll just hope that we'll not be devoured by "someone" who loves that "deep knowledge." And everything will be easy..everything is manipulated.
Dharma Graphics - Architects
When I think about China's Sharp Eyes with cameras tracking your moves I remember George Orwell's 1984.

Gab: The Free Speech Site Update 2.

  • Wednesday, 05 October 2022 22:06
 Screenshot 2gab free speech web


Trump's refusal to join Gab is a denial of his beliefs.

EXCLUSIVE: Gab Founder Says Trump Handlers Asked Him to Censor Free Speech Site

Trump's refusal to join Gab is a denial of his beliefs--"Facebook and Twitter are abusing §230--pretending they're just platforms, who are not responsible for content, when they're really publishers, by dint of censorship, who must therefore be held responsible for their content!"--if Trump joined Gab, nothing would have changed in his beliefs, he would only have aligned himself with them.
That said, I understand why he wants to avoid the baseless accusations the media will sling at him the moment he joins Gab--they already refuse to acknowledge the video recorded truth pretending he hasn't denounced and renounced David Duke. That's with video. On video where it's 100% solid proof positive. Imagine trying to explain a slightly nuanced situation like joining Gab. Forget it.
still amazing, how everyone is still defending Trump, like he was some hapless buffoon, who knows nothing about hiring personnel. BUCK stops with him. Either you're a leader or you're not. Trump was never ready for primetime. He LET them steal the biggest political landslide in history. He LET buffoon like Pelosi & Shumer engineer that theft. He literally had his win stolen by a demented, dementia patient! WTF does that say about him?? He has no one else to blame. He NEVER defended any of his supporters, least of all: Alex Jones. F Trump. It's not just Zionist rag Kushner. It's Trump himself. STOP making insane Stockholm Syndrome rationalizations.
Write to Gab

Gab AI Inc.
700 N State Street
Clarks Summit, PA 18411
Attn: Data Privacy Department

Contact Information

To ask questions or comment about this privacy policy and our privacy practices, contact us at:

Gab AI Inc.
700 N State Street
Clarks Summit, PA 18411

Screenshot 2we b freedom
 Screenshot ceo

We need your help.

Gab is 100% funded by our users, not special interests. 

Last week we were blacklisted by Visa and lost credit card processing.

You can still support us via eCheck, bitcoin, and physical check by mail. 

Please upgrade to GabPRO to unlock additional features on Gab and support us.

Screenshot 2jerusScreenshot 2jew mug


Screenshot 1tyt tro

Rainbow Snatch runs into the Young Turks at the 2020 Democratic Primary Presidential debate. Unbeknownst to Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian, 'Rainbow Snatch' is Millie Weaver, but by the time they figure it out, it's too late!

TYT Trolled By Infowars Reporter!